Double Blind Peer Review & Editorial Process

This Policy is applicable to all publications submitted to the research journals of the Lahore Medical Research Center and they must undergo Double blind peer review involving internal and external reviewers. This involves review by two independent peer reviewers.

All submissions to DIET FACTOR (Journal of Nutritional & Food Sciences) are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief, who will decide whether they are suitable for in house editing and further process.

In case of conflict of interest regarding a specific manuscript, a member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer review.

Manuscripts after satisfactory reports from plagiarism check, bibliography report and statistical check will be sent for two or more peer reviews to appropriate independent experts preferably from technologically advanced countries. The manuscript will be returned to author if reports are unsatisfactory and will be informed.

Editors will make a decision based on the reviewers’ reports. The approval for publication is based on approval from two independent blind peer reviews. Rejection is also based on two independent blind peer reviews.

Authors should remove the concerns raised by reviewers within given time. Failure to respond in time or corrections not accepted by reviewers may result in the manuscript being rejected. The modifications from authors need final approval from the reviewers prior to publication.

DIET FACTOR (Journal of Nutritional & Food Sciences) operates a closed peer review process. Reviewers will be treated anonymously and the pre-publication history of each article will not be made available online.

Intentionally falsifying information, for example, authors or reviewers with a false name or email address, will result in rejection of the manuscript and may lead to penalty according to misconduct policy.